Quixtar Arbitration Agreement Legally Unenforceable?
Posted on 20. Sep, 2005 by Ty Tribble in Quixtar
I just unleashed 7 of my most closely guarded Internet Marketing files for the first time. Download Ty Tribble's MLM Web Secrets. It's my free gift to you for visiting.
Last Friday (Sept. 16) a Missouri Federal Judge denied Quixtar's motion to compel the infamous "Hart Lawsuit" to arbitration. The ruling by District Court Judge Richard E. Dorr could have long-term repercussions for Quixtar by jeopardizing the ironclad BSMAA.
Judge Dorr's 26-page decision (pdf) is a lot to digest but it's well worth the effort and doesn't disappoint. For those with shorter attention spans, the lawBlawg provides a few highlights from the order. What I found most interesting begins on page 23 (pdf):
It is this Court's opinion that the procedure utilized by Defendants to screen, train and ultimately hand-pick their panel of arbitrators does not come close to passing any reasonable test of fairness and neutrality required for a legitimate arbitration proceeding.
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!Related posts:
- The AmQuix.info Files – Pennsylvania Court Denies Quixtar Arbitration in Scheibeler Case
- Missouri Supreme Court Rules Against Amway – Quixtar Arbitration
- U.S. Court of Appeals Says No Arbitration for Amway (Quixtar) Tools Business
- Court Tosses Out Amway/Quixtar Arbitration?
- Nitro Distributing vs. Alticor (court audio) – Quixtar Arbitration Issue










Recent Comments