<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ho Controversy and the Quixtar Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mlmblog.net/2006/05/hos_controversy.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mlmblog.net/2006/05/hos_controversy.html</link>
	<description>MLM News - MLM Reviews - Network Marketing News - Network Marketing Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:02:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonny</title>
		<link>http://mlmblog.net/2006/05/hos_controversy.html/comment-page-1#comment-2313</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 09:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/mlmblog/?p=1453#comment-2313</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, I see no problers with advertorials. Basically, in essence, it&#039;s a form of a press release and nothing more.  And we both know of press release sites that charge you an arm and a leg to post your little biased advertisings correct?  Even those I see nothing wrong with.  If you have a heavily trafficked site, well listed on search engines, and you have readers... I would want to make some money off of it as well.  No big sin. &lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I see no problers with advertorials. Basically, in essence, it&#39;s a form of a press release and nothing more.  And we both know of press release sites that charge you an arm and a leg to post your little biased advertisings correct?  Even those I see nothing wrong with.  If you have a heavily trafficked site, well listed on search engines, and you have readers&#8230; I would want to make some money off of it as well.  No big sin. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
