Comments on: Missouri Supreme Court Rules Against Amway – Quixtar Arbitration http://mlmblog.net/2006/05/missouri_suprem.html MLM News - MLM Reviews - Network Marketing News - Network Marketing Reviews Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:45:20 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: David Robison http://mlmblog.net/2006/05/missouri_suprem.html/comment-page-1#comment-2375 David Robison Tue, 02 May 2006 18:11:50 +0000 http://localhost/mlmblog/?p=1486#comment-2375 <p>Maybe, I'm reading it wrong.</p> <p>It appears that this ruling does not rule AGAINST the Amway Arbitration process, it rules that another process applies among the parties in this lawsuit.</p> <p>Breaking news would be that the Amway Arbitration process or the arbitrators, JAMS; were wrong or unfair to IBOs.</p> <p>It also seems that the legal hoo-ha is more about how Stewart represented him self as a "party" separately and as a business entity; rather than the issues of pro and con of selling BSMs.</p> <p>But then again, I don't know my "habeus" from my "corpus"</p> <p>Dave<br /> </p> Maybe, I'm reading it wrong.

It appears that this ruling does not rule AGAINST the Amway Arbitration process, it rules that another process applies among the parties in this lawsuit.

Breaking news would be that the Amway Arbitration process or the arbitrators, JAMS; were wrong or unfair to IBOs.

It also seems that the legal hoo-ha is more about how Stewart represented him self as a "party" separately and as a business entity; rather than the issues of pro and con of selling BSMs.

But then again, I don't know my "habeus" from my "corpus"

Dave

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]>