<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quixtar Accreditation: Transparency or Lip Service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mlmblog.net/2006/11/quixtar_accredi.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mlmblog.net/site/2006/11/quixtar_accredi.html</link>
	<description>MLM News - MLM Reviews - Network Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 14:21:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ty</title>
		<link>http://mlmblog.net/site/2006/11/quixtar_accredi.html/comment-page-1#comment-2134</link>
		<dc:creator>Ty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 17:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/mlmblog/?p=1190#comment-2134</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, OK.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Do I have to give the upline platinum a secret handshake?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Stupid and NOT TRANSPARENT.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, OK.</p>
<p>Do I have to give the upline platinum a secret handshake?</p>
<p>Stupid and NOT TRANSPARENT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: insider</title>
		<link>http://mlmblog.net/site/2006/11/quixtar_accredi.html/comment-page-1#comment-2133</link>
		<dc:creator>insider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/mlmblog/?p=1190#comment-2133</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ask your upline platinum and above.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ask your upline platinum and above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ty</title>
		<link>http://mlmblog.net/site/2006/11/quixtar_accredi.html/comment-page-1#comment-2132</link>
		<dc:creator>Ty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 08:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/mlmblog/?p=1190#comment-2132</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Wiktionary:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Transparent -&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A quality of a system or organization wherein theories and practices are publicly visible, which reduces the chances for corruption.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Where can a prospect see these contracts?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In the long run, tool money would be a large portion of ones income and one would think that a &quot;transparent&quot; program would have the information available.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wiktionary:</p>
<p>Transparent -</p>
<p>A quality of a system or organization wherein theories and practices are publicly visible, which reduces the chances for corruption.</p>
<p>Where can a prospect see these contracts?</p>
<p>In the long run, tool money would be a large portion of ones income and one would think that a &quot;transparent&quot; program would have the information available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: insider</title>
		<link>http://mlmblog.net/site/2006/11/quixtar_accredi.html/comment-page-1#comment-2131</link>
		<dc:creator>insider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 05:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/mlmblog/?p=1190#comment-2131</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;transparent&quot; does not necessarily mean *publicly* visible. Some IBO organizations have been known in the past (and present?) to have no contracts, operate on a wink and a handshake, one emerald could be on one deal, another on another deal, and nobody would know who had what and it could all be changed at the whim of the upline in control.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you want accreditation you can&#039;t do that. Participants need to know what&#039;s going on. Doesn&#039;t mean competitors like you do.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;transparent&quot; does not necessarily mean *publicly* visible. Some IBO organizations have been known in the past (and present?) to have no contracts, operate on a wink and a handshake, one emerald could be on one deal, another on another deal, and nobody would know who had what and it could all be changed at the whim of the upline in control.</p>
<p>If you want accreditation you can&#39;t do that. Participants need to know what&#39;s going on. Doesn&#39;t mean competitors like you do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ty</title>
		<link>http://mlmblog.net/site/2006/11/quixtar_accredi.html/comment-page-1#comment-2130</link>
		<dc:creator>Ty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/mlmblog/?p=1190#comment-2130</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Don&#039;t play stupid, Insider.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What does &quot;transparent&quot; mean?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I believe it means pubicaly visable.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Is the contract publicaly visable?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#39;t play stupid, Insider.</p>
<p>What does &quot;transparent&quot; mean?</p>
<p>I believe it means pubicaly visable.</p>
<p>Is the contract publicaly visable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: insider</title>
		<link>http://mlmblog.net/site/2006/11/quixtar_accredi.html/comment-page-1#comment-2129</link>
		<dc:creator>insider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 15:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/mlmblog/?p=1190#comment-2129</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What? They didn&#039;t send you a copy of the contracts? I&#039;m sure you would have been first to be informed Ty!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Please Ty, explain your thinking that makes you believe they should have sent you a copy?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What? They didn&#39;t send you a copy of the contracts? I&#39;m sure you would have been first to be informed Ty!</p>
<p>Please Ty, explain your thinking that makes you believe they should have sent you a copy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

