Comments on: Quixtar 2006 Sales http://mlmblog.net/site/2007/02/quixtar_2006_sa.html MLM News - MLM Reviews - Network Marketing News - Network Marketing Reviews Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:19:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Ty http://mlmblog.net/site/2007/02/quixtar_2006_sa.html/comment-page-1#comment-1856 Ty Sat, 03 Feb 2007 11:53:15 +0000 http://localhost/mlmblog/?p=1026#comment-1856 <p>I see what they are trying to say now. So they did not announce what the fiscal year 2006 sales were. I will adjust my post.</p> I see what they are trying to say now. So they did not announce what the fiscal year 2006 sales were. I will adjust my post.

]]> By: Bob http://mlmblog.net/site/2007/02/quixtar_2006_sa.html/comment-page-1#comment-1855 Bob Sat, 03 Feb 2007 10:40:02 +0000 http://localhost/mlmblog/?p=1026#comment-1855 <p>Quixtar says: $1.118 sales for calendar year 2006 and $1.094 for calendar year 2005. The difference is $240 million. Divide that by their 370,000 IBOs and you will see that each IBO increased his sales by $64.86 for the year. That means that the average IBO has increased his sales $5.40 per month in 2006 verses 2005. WOW. Five dollars and forty cents a month. That is surely staggering growth. Consider increased cost of products and inflation & you cannot deny that the average IBO is worse off in 2006 than in 2005. </p> Quixtar says: $1.118 sales for calendar year 2006 and $1.094 for calendar year 2005. The difference is $240 million. Divide that by their 370,000 IBOs and you will see that each IBO increased his sales by $64.86 for the year. That means that the average IBO has increased his sales $5.40 per month in 2006 verses 2005. WOW. Five dollars and forty cents a month. That is surely staggering growth. Consider increased cost of products and inflation & you cannot deny that the average IBO is worse off in 2006 than in 2005.

]]> By: Ty http://mlmblog.net/site/2007/02/quixtar_2006_sa.html/comment-page-1#comment-1854 Ty Sat, 03 Feb 2007 08:29:02 +0000 http://localhost/mlmblog/?p=1026#comment-1854 <p>WHAT!? Are you out of your mind?</p> <p>What do you think this means?</p> <p>"The company's highest annual sales total ever represented a 2.2 percent increase over 2005 calendar year sales of $1.094 billion. Quixtar reported sales of $1.058 billion for the fiscal year that ended Aug. 31, 2005"</p> <p>I suspect that they meant to say "$1.058 Billion for the fiscal year that ended Aug. 31st, 2006" because they just stated 2005 sales as $1.094 Billion.</p> <p>They might have weird math in Europe, but even in U.S. public school, $1.058 is less than $1.094 and none of these number are good for a person that wants to build a business with a growing company.</p> WHAT!? Are you out of your mind?

What do you think this means?

"The company's highest annual sales total ever represented a 2.2 percent increase over 2005 calendar year sales of $1.094 billion. Quixtar reported sales of $1.058 billion for the fiscal year that ended Aug. 31, 2005"

I suspect that they meant to say "$1.058 Billion for the fiscal year that ended Aug. 31st, 2006" because they just stated 2005 sales as $1.094 Billion.

They might have weird math in Europe, but even in U.S. public school, $1.058 is less than $1.094 and none of these number are good for a person that wants to build a business with a growing company.

]]> By: ibofightback http://mlmblog.net/site/2007/02/quixtar_2006_sa.html/comment-page-1#comment-1853 ibofightback Sat, 03 Feb 2007 07:47:08 +0000 http://localhost/mlmblog/?p=1026#comment-1853 <p>Good one Ty, assume 2006 sales are the same as 2005 fiscal year sales, with no evidence at all, and then claim sales were down! well done! lol!</p> Good one Ty, assume 2006 sales are the same as 2005 fiscal year sales, with no evidence at all, and then claim sales were down! well done! lol!

]]>